Filed: Mar. 28, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 730 F.2d 910 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THRALL CAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 920, Docket 83-7888. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued March 19, 1984. Decided March 28, 1984. Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant. Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., Ne
Summary: 730 F.2d 910 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408 Phyllis SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THRALL CAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 920, Docket 83-7888. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued March 19, 1984. Decided March 28, 1984. Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant. Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., New..
More
730 F.2d 910
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,408
Phyllis SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THRALL CAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 920, Docket 83-7888.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued March 19, 1984.
Decided March 28, 1984.
Avrom S. Fisher, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.
Lewis A. Kaplan, New York City (Harriet L. Goldberg, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Charles S. Barquist, Parker Auspitz Neeseman & Delehanty P.C., New York City, on brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before MANSFIELD, NEWMAN and PRATT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr., Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co., 582 F. Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
