Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

1255 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 1255 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 22, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 962 F.2d 199 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Sandy F. ALEXANDER, Collette Alexander, Kimberly Alexander, Howard S. Weisbrod, Mary Weisbrod, Herbert Kittel, Michelle Kittel, Charles Zito, Defendants, Paul F. Casey, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1255, Docket 91-1746. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued April 13, 1992. Decided April 22, 1992. Richard J. Appel, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., Daniel C. Richman, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y.
More

962 F.2d 199

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Sandy F. ALEXANDER, Collette Alexander, Kimberly Alexander,
Howard S. Weisbrod, Mary Weisbrod, Herbert Kittel,
Michelle Kittel, Charles Zito, Defendants,
Paul F. Casey, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 1255, Docket 91-1746.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued April 13, 1992.
Decided April 22, 1992.

Richard J. Appel, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., Daniel C. Richman, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Harriet B. Rosen, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND and PRATT, Circuit Judges, and Michael B. MUKASEY, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Leval's opinion, United States v. Casey, 788 F. Supp. 725 (S.D.N.Y.1991).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer