Benitez v. Gonda, 91-2587 (1992)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Number: 91-2587
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 22, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 963 F.2d 1522 Benitez v. Gonda NO. 91-2587 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Apr 22, 1992 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 778 F. Supp. 200 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Second Circuit provides by rule for 3 disposition by summary order when a decision is unanimous 4 and each judge believes that 'no jurisprudential purpose 5 would be served by a written opinion.' Decisions without 6 formal opinions 'shall not be cited or otherwise used in 7 unrelated cases.' Second Circuit Rules, § 0.2
Summary: 963 F.2d 1522 Benitez v. Gonda NO. 91-2587 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Apr 22, 1992 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 778 F. Supp. 200 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Second Circuit provides by rule for 3 disposition by summary order when a decision is unanimous 4 and each judge believes that 'no jurisprudential purpose 5 would be served by a written opinion.' Decisions without 6 formal opinions 'shall not be cited or otherwise used in 7 unrelated cases.' Second Circuit Rules, § 0.23..
More
963 F.2d 1522
Benitez
v.
Gonda
NO. 91-2587
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Apr 22, 1992
Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 778 F. Supp. 200
2
Federal Reporter. The Second Circuit provides by rule for
3
disposition by summary order when a decision is unanimous
4
and each judge believes that 'no jurisprudential purpose
5
would be served by a written opinion.' Decisions without
6
formal opinions 'shall not be cited or otherwise used in
7
unrelated cases.' Second Circuit Rules, § 0.23, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Source: CourtListener
