Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

2068 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 2068 Visitors: 45
Filed: Jul. 28, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 31 F.3d 66 William CHANOFF, David Chanoff, Rachel Chanoff and Harriet Fingerote, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION, Leon Hirsch, Turi Josefson, Bruce C. Lustman and Marianne Scipione, Defendants-Appellees. No. 2068, Docket 94-7332. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued July 21, 1994. Decided July 28, 1994. Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from Judge Nevas's ruling granting defendants-appellees' Rule 12(b)(6) motion with respect to plaintiffs' claims of, in
More

31 F.3d 66

William CHANOFF, David Chanoff, Rachel Chanoff and Harriet
Fingerote, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION, Leon Hirsch, Turi
Josefson, Bruce C. Lustman and Marianne Scipione,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2068, Docket 94-7332.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued July 21, 1994.
Decided July 28, 1994.

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from Judge Nevas's ruling granting defendants-appellees' Rule 12(b)(6) motion with respect to plaintiffs' claims of, inter alia, common law fraud and federal securities violations. We affirm.

Barbara Moses, New York City (Gregory A. Markel, Gary E. Weiss, Michael B. Carlinsky, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York City, Thomas J. Byrne, James T. Shearin, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, of counsel), for appellants.

Dale A. Schreiber, New York City (Charles S. Sims, Lawrence S. Block, Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, of counsel), for appellees.

Prior report: 857 F. Supp. 1011.

Before: WINTER, McLAUGHLIN, and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer