Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Angelo Favarolo v. United States, 96-2017 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 96-2017 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 13, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 101 F.3d 687 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Angelo FAVAROLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-2017. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 13, 1996. 1 Angelo Favarolo, pro se, Lewisburg, PA, for appell
More

101 F.3d 687

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
Angelo FAVAROLO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-2017.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 13, 1996.

1

Angelo Favarolo, pro se, Lewisburg, PA, for appellant.

2

Zachary W. Carter, U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, NY, for appellee.

3

Before NEWMAN and JACOBS, Circuit Judge, and CHATIGNY,* District Judge.

4

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was taken on submission.

5

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

6

Angelo Favarolo appeals pro se from the District Court's December 13, 1995, order denying his second application for bail pending disposition of his motion to vacate a sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such motions require a showing of extraordinary circumstances meriting relief, see Iuteri v. Nardoza, 662 F.2d 159 (2d Cir.1981), and the denial in this instance was fully justified.

*

Of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer