Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

96-2619 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 96-2619 Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 06, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 108 F.3d 329 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Jimmie Lee ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas A. COUGHLIN, III, Donald Selski, Jose Pico, Charles J. Scully, Wallace Oldham, C. Artuz, M. Haubert S. Phillips, Nad KKM Thornton, Jointly, Severally, and Individuall
More

108 F.3d 329

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
Jimmie Lee ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas A. COUGHLIN, III, Donald Selski, Jose Pico, Charles
J. Scully, Wallace Oldham, C. Artuz, M. Haubert S. Phillips,
Nad KKM Thornton, Jointly, Severally, and Individually,
Respectively, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-2619.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 6, 1997.

APPEARING FOR APPELLANT:Jimmie Lee Allen, pro se, (Auburn Correctional Facility, Auburn, New York)

APPEARING FOR APPELLEES:Charles F. Sanders, Assistant Attorney General (Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General for the State of New York, Thomas D. Hughes, Assistant Solicitor General, New York, New York)

PRESENT: ELLSWORTH A. VAN GRAAFEILAND, THOMAS J. MESKILL, JOSE A. CABRANES, Circuit Judges.

1

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and was taken on submission.

2

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

3

We affirm the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Cedarbaum's Memorandum Opinions and Orders dated March 16, 1995 and June 28, 1996.

4

We have considered all of the plaintiffs' contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer