Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, Petitioners-Plaintiffs v. Phillip Morris, Inc., Respondents-Defendants, 00-8038 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 00-8038 Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 02, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 270 F.3d 984 (2nd Cir. 2001) National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. Phillip Morris, Inc., et al., Respondents-Defendants. No. 00-8038 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT November 2, 2001. Present: Walker, Chief Judge, Jacobs, and Leval, Circuit Judges. 1 Petitioners-plaintiffs have filed a petition, pursuant to Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for permission to appeal t
More

270 F.3d 984 (2nd Cir. 2001)

National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs,
v.
Phillip Morris, Inc., et al., Respondents-Defendants.

No. 00-8038

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

November 2, 2001.

Present: Walker, Chief Judge, Jacobs, and Leval, Circuit Judges.

1

Petitioners-plaintiffs have filed a petition, pursuant to Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for permission to appeal two orders of the district court that, inter alia, denied their request for class certification. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied because petitioners have failed to satisfy the standard enunciated in Sumitomo Copper Litigation v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd., 262 F.3d 134, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001), for the grant of an interlocutory appeal from a district court's class certification opinion.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer