Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walter Sedovic Architect, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. John A. Alesandro, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees, 99-9463 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 99-9463 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 237 F.3d 693 (2nd Cir. 2001) Walter Sedovic Architect, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. John A. Alesandro, et al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees. No. 99-9463 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Jan. 16, 2001. Present KEARSE, JACOBS and CABRANES, Circuit Judges. 1 Counsel for certain defendants-counterclaimants-appellees having informed this Court in or about November 2000 that the above action has been settled, 2 And this Court having unsuccessfully reques
More

237 F.3d 693 (2nd Cir. 2001)

Walter Sedovic Architect, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
John A. Alesandro, et al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees.

No. 99-9463

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 16, 2001.

Present KEARSE, JACOBS and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.

1

Counsel for certain defendants-counterclaimants-appellees having informed this Court in or about November 2000 that the above action has been settled,

2

And this Court having unsuccessfully requested the parties to file a stipulation of discontinuance of the appeal, which was scheduled to be heard on January 10, 2001,

3

And this Court having telephoned the office of Philip Furgang, Furgang & Adwar ("Furgang"), counsel of record for plaintiff-counterclaim-defendant-appellant ("plaintiff"), and having eventually been informed by Furgang that the matter has been settled and that written confirmation would be forthcoming from Kevin J. O'Neill, Gogic, Byrne & O'Neill ("O'Neill"), another firm representing plaintiff,

4

And O'Neill, having sent this Court a letter dated January 5, 2001, stating that this appeal has been rendered moot because the matter has been settled, and attaching a copy of a stipulation of dismissal filed in the district court and so-ordered by that court on December 4, 2000,

5

It is hereby ordered that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer