Filed: Oct. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2012
Summary: SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellant Amiel Dabush, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his claim brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. We review de novo a district court's grant
Summary: SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellant Amiel Dabush, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his claim brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. We review de novo a district court's grant o..
More
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Appellant Amiel Dabush, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his claim brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment with the view that "[s]ummary judgment is appropriate only if the moving party shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir. 2003).
Upon such review, we conclude that Dabush's appeal is without merit substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its well-reasoned order. See Dabush v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 10-cv-67 (D. Conn. Aug. 15, 2011). We have considered Dabush's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
