CARRION v. AGFA CONSTRUCTION, INC., 733 F.3d 490 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Number: infco20131030119
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER Following disposition of this appeal on June 13, 2013, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Grochowski v. Phoenix Constr., 318
Summary: ORDER Following disposition of this appeal on June 13, 2013, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Grochowski v. Phoenix Constr., 318 F..
More
ORDER
Following disposition of this appeal on June 13, 2013, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Grochowski v. Phoenix Constr., 318 F.3d 80, 89 (2d Cir.2003) (Lynch, D.J., dissenting), and by the New York Court of Appeals in Cox v. NAP Constr. Co., 10 N.Y.3d 592, 861 N.Y.S.2d 238, 891 N.E.2d 271 (2008).
Source: Leagle
