14‐45 Tashara Pinet v. County of Onondaga, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15th day of December, two thousand fourteen. PRESENT: RICHARD C. WESLEY, PETER W. HALL, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges. ____________________________________________ TASHARA PINET, Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Raul Pinet, Jr., Plaintiff‐Appellant, ‐v.‐ No. 14‐45 COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, KEVIN E. WALSH, in his individual and official capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, KEVIN BRISSON, in his individual and official capacity as the 1 Head of the Security and Operation Division for the Onondaga County Sheriff’s Office Custody Department, RICHARD CARBERY, in his individual and official capacity as the Chief of the Onondaga Sheriff’s Office Custody Department, JOHN DOES 1‐10, said names being fictitious as the individual corrections officers who were in charge of decedent while at the Onondaga County Justice Center, Defendants‐Appellees.* ____________________________________________ For Plaintiff‐Appellant: Brian M. Dratch, Franzblau Dratch, P.C., Livingston, N.J. For Defendants‐Appellees: Kathleen M. Dougherty, Senior Deputy County Attorney, for Gordon J. Cuffy, Onondaga County Attorney, Syracuse, N.Y. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Tashara Pinet appeals from a Memorandum‐Decision and Order in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.) dated November 26, 2013. We affirm for reasons stated by the district court. * The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption as above. 2  The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 3