Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McDowell v. Heiner, 3511 (1926)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 3511 Visitors: 8
Judges: Buffington, Woolley, and Davis, Circuit Judges
Filed: Dec. 07, 1926
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 15 F.2d 1015 (1926) Caroline H. McDOWELL, Executrix of Estate of Jesse C. McDowell, Deceased, Appellant, v. D. B. HEINER, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellee. No. 3511. Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. December 7, 1926. William G. Heiner, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant. Charles T. Hendler, of Washington, D. C., John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and A. W. Gregg and Chester A. Gwinn, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Harr
More
15 F.2d 1015 (1926)

Caroline H. McDOWELL, Executrix of Estate of Jesse C. McDowell, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
D. B. HEINER, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellee.

No. 3511.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

December 7, 1926.

William G. Heiner, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Charles T. Hendler, of Washington, D. C., John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and A. W. Gregg and Chester A. Gwinn, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., amicus curiƦ.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the court below, reported at 9 F.(2d) 120, is so full and satisfactory that a further one by this court cannot perforce be but an attempt to restate what that court satisfactorily said. We therefore restrict ourselves to adopting its opinion and affirming its decree, dismissing plaintiff's bill.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer