Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Haynes, 9830 (1949)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 9830 Visitors: 19
Judges: Goodrich, Waller, and Kalodner, Circuit Judges
Filed: Mar. 01, 1949
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 173 F.2d 223 (1949) UNITED STATES of America v. Benjamin J. HAYNES et al., Appellants. No. 9830. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued February 21, 1949. Decided March 1, 1949. J. Harry Pershing, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Van A. Barrickman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants. W. Wendell Stanton, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Owen M. Burns, U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee. Before GOODRICH, WALLER, and KALODNER, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
More
173 F.2d 223 (1949)

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Benjamin J. HAYNES et al., Appellants.

No. 9830.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued February 21, 1949.
Decided March 1, 1949.

J. Harry Pershing, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Van A. Barrickman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

W. Wendell Stanton, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Owen M. Burns, U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, WALLER, and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The points made by the appellant in this case were presented to the District Court and considered in an opinion filed by him. 81 F. Supp. 63. We have made independent examination of the points and our conclusion is that neither singly nor collectively is there anything in them meriting reversal.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer