Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated v. Du Bois Brewing Company, 10406_1 (1951)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 10406_1 Visitors: 29
Filed: Oct. 05, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 191 F.2d 733 91 U.S.P.Q. 222 ANHEUSER-BUSCH, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DU BOIS BREWING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10406. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 2, 1951. Decided Oct. 5, 1951. Wallace H. Martin, New York City (Alter, Wright & Barron, Pittsburgh, Pa., Minturn de S. Verdi, Walter J. Halliday, Robert Bonynge, New York City, Alexander J. Barron, James Milholland, Pittsburgh, Pa., Nims, Verdi & Martin, New York City, Shepley, Kroeger, Fisse & Ingame
More

191 F.2d 733

91 U.S.P.Q. 222

ANHEUSER-BUSCH, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DU BOIS BREWING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10406.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 2, 1951.
Decided Oct. 5, 1951.

Wallace H. Martin, New York City (Alter, Wright & Barron, Pittsburgh, Pa., Minturn de S. Verdi, Walter J. Halliday, Robert Bonynge, New York City, Alexander J. Barron, James Milholland, Pittsburgh, Pa., Nims, Verdi & Martin, New York City, Shepley, Kroeger, Fisse & Ingamells, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant.

John C. Bane, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Leo R. Brockbank, Du Bois, Pa., Edler W. Marshall, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Du Bois Brewing Co.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The actions of the District Court, in vacating all of the findings of fact and conclusions of law originally made by the District Court in this matter, in making new findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in entering judgment dismissing the complaint as it did, are in conformity with the opinion, 3 Cir., 175 F.2d 370, the two orders (entered July 27, 1949) and the mandate of this Court (issued May 18, 1950), all in this cause.

2

The judgment of the District Court of October 26, 1950 from which this appeal was taken will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer