Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Harriman Ripley & Co., Incorporated, Successor by Merger to Cramp Shipbuilding Company, 10912_1 (1953)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 10912_1 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 06, 1953
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: 202 F.2d 280 53-1 USTC P 9242 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner v. HARRIMAN RIPLEY & CO., Incorporated, Successor By Merger To Cramp Shipbuilding Company, Respondent. Nos. 10911, 10912. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Feb. 20, 1953. Decided March 6, 1953. Hilbert P. Zarky, Washington, D.C. (Charles S. Lyon and H. Brian Holland, Asst. Attys. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and Hilbert P. Zarky, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas Re
More

202 F.2d 280

53-1 USTC P 9242

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner
v.
HARRIMAN RIPLEY & CO., Incorporated, Successor By Merger To
Cramp Shipbuilding Company, Respondent.

Nos. 10911, 10912.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 20, 1953.
Decided March 6, 1953.

Hilbert P. Zarky, Washington, D.C. (Charles S. Lyon and H. Brian Holland, Asst. Attys. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and Hilbert P. Zarky, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for petitioner.

Thomas Reath, Philadelphia, Pa. (Calvin H. Rankin, Frederick E. S. Morrison and Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The Tax Court has allowed respondent, a taxpayer, certain amortization deductions claimed to be authorized by a closing agreement. Under the facts as stipulated the Tax Court, 17 T.C. 516, has properly construed and applied the closing agreement.

2

The decisions will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer