Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith, 11354_1 (1954)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 11354_1 Visitors: 32
Filed: Jul. 13, 1954
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 214 F.2d 820 GRANVILLE-SMITH v. GRANVILLE-SMITH. No. 11354. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1954. Decided July 13, 1954. Dudley, Hoffman & McGowan, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Warren H. Young, Christiansted, St. Croix, V. I., for appellee. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This case is the same with regard to al
More

214 F.2d 820

GRANVILLE-SMITH
v.
GRANVILLE-SMITH.

No. 11354.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted June 25, 1954.

Decided July 13, 1954.

Dudley, Hoffman & McGowan, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Warren H. Young, Christiansted, St. Croix, V. I., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case is the same with regard to all operative facts and principles of law as Alton v. Alton, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 667, certiorari granted, 1954, 347 U.S. 911, 74 S. Ct. 478; proceedings dismissed because moot, June 1, 1954. That decision must govern this. While individual members of the Court have not modified their views as set out in the opinions in that case, all recognize the authority of a decision rendered after due consideration by the Court en banc.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer