Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant, 11445_1 (1955)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 11445_1 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 31, 1955
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 218 F.2d 823 AMERICAN DREDGING COMPANY, Appellant, v. CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Cross-Libellant, No. 11445. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 19, 1955. Decided January 31, 1955. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Clary, Judge. Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia (Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh, & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant. Leslie C. Krusen, Philadelphia, Pa., (Krusen, Evans
More

218 F.2d 823

AMERICAN DREDGING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Cross-Libellant,

No. 11445.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued January 19, 1955.

Decided January 31, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Clary, Judge.

Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia (Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh, & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Leslie C. Krusen, Philadelphia, Pa., (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court, 121 F. Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S. Ct. 6.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer