Filed: Jan. 07, 1957
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 239 F.2d 384 Marvin Vale WILSON v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 12056. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 7, 1956. Decided Jan. 7, 1957. Bruce R. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant. Louis C. Glasso, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, KALODNER, Circuit Judge, and KRAFT, district judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral
Summary: 239 F.2d 384 Marvin Vale WILSON v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 12056. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 7, 1956. Decided Jan. 7, 1957. Bruce R. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant. Louis C. Glasso, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, KALODNER, Circuit Judge, and KRAFT, district judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral a..
More
239 F.2d 384
Marvin Vale WILSON
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 12056.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 7, 1956.
Decided Jan. 7, 1957.
Bruce R. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Louis C. Glasso, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, KALODNER, Circuit Judge, and KRAFT, district judge.
PER CURIAM.
1
Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral argument in the case at bar convince us that the appeal is without merit. Consequently the judgment of the court below, D.C., 141 F. Supp. 233, will be affirmed.
