Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sigmund Pollack v. City of Newark, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and Others Unknown to at This Time, 12207 (1957)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12207 Visitors: 26
Filed: Nov. 22, 1957
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 248 F.2d 543 Sigmund POLLACK, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWARK, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and others unknown to plaintiff at this time. No. 12207. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Nov. 4, 1957. Decided Nov. 8, 1957, As Amended Nov. 22, 1957. Sigmund Pollack, pro se. Thomas M. Kane, Newark, N.J. (Vincent P. Torppey, Corporation Counsel, City of Newark, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellees. Before MARIS, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The plain
More

248 F.2d 543

Sigmund POLLACK, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and
others unknown to plaintiff at this time.

No. 12207.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 4, 1957.
Decided Nov. 8, 1957, As Amended Nov. 22, 1957.

Sigmund Pollack, pro se.

Thomas M. Kane, Newark, N.J. (Vincent P. Torppey, Corporation Counsel, City of Newark, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MARIS, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The plaintiff has appealed from orders of the District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment for the defendants in the plaintiff's suit against them for alleged deprivation of his civil rights. The plaintiff's contentions were fully discussed and correctly disposed of in an able opinion filed in the district court by Judge Modarelli to which we need add nothing.

2

The orders of the district court will be affirmed. 147 F. Supp. 35.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer