Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Emanuel Riggi, 12508 (1958)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12508 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 27, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 256 F.2d 57 UNITED STATES of America v. Emanuel RIGGI. No. 12508. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued May 12, 1958. Decided May 27, 1958. Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N.J. (Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant. Frederic C. Ritger, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J. (Chester A. Weidenburner, U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee. Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Our review of the record discloses that the
More

256 F.2d 57

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Emanuel RIGGI.

No. 12508.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 12, 1958.
Decided May 27, 1958.

Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N.J. (Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.

Frederic C. Ritger, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J. (Chester A. Weidenburner, U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Our review of the record discloses that there was ample evidence to sustain the jury's verdict.

2

We find no error in the trial court's charge to the jury. Further, we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury in the language set forth by the defendant in his requests Nos. 18 and 19. The substance of the requested instructions was adequately embraced in the trial court's charge to the jury.

3

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer