Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Morgenstern Chemical Company, Inc. v. G. D. Searle & Company, 12653 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12653 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 06, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 262 F.2d 592 MORGENSTERN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. G. D. SEARLE & COMPANY. No. 12653. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued January 22, 1959. Decided February 6, 1959. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Judge. 1 See also 253 F.2d 390 . 2 Copal Mintz, New York City, for appellant. 3 Frederick B. Lacey, Newark, N. J. (Shanley & Fisher, Newark, N. J., Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N. J., Howard P. Robinson, Ch
More

262 F.2d 592

MORGENSTERN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Inc., Appellant,
v.
G. D. SEARLE & COMPANY.

No. 12653.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 22, 1959.

Decided February 6, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Judge.

1

See also 253 F.2d 390.

2

Copal Mintz, New York City, for appellant.

3

Frederick B. Lacey, Newark, N. J. (Shanley & Fisher, Newark, N. J., Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N. J., Howard P. Robinson, Chicago, Ill., of the Illinois Bar, on the brief), for appellee.

4

Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and EGAN, District Judge.

5

PER CURIAM.

6

Upon review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer