Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

12766-12768 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12766-12768 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 26, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 264 F.2d 789 Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Mary G. Clark, Deceased v. Edwin S. KAMMERER and Walter Edelen, Edwin S. Kammerer, Appellant. Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Thelma J. Graham, Deceased v. Edwin S. KAMMERER and Walter Edelen, Edwin S. Kammerer, Appellant. Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Alfred William Fallon, Deceased v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Allegheny County Sanitary Authority and United Foundation, United Foundation, Appellant.
More

264 F.2d 789

Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Mary G. Clark, Deceased
v.
Edwin S. KAMMERER and Walter Edelen, Edwin S. Kammerer, Appellant.
Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Thelma J.
Graham, Deceased
v.
Edwin S. KAMMERER and Walter Edelen, Edwin S. Kammerer, Appellant.
Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Alfred
William Fallon, Deceased
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Allegheny County Sanitary
Authority and United Foundation, United
Foundation, Appellant.

Nos. 12766-12768.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 1, 1958.
Decided Feb. 26, 1959.

James F. Manley, Pittsburgh, Pa., (James J. Burns, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

James P. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

These appeals present the same issues as those decided today in Corabi v. Auto Racing Co., 3 Cir., 264 F.2d 784. We note that in thirty-three additional civil actions in the court below Mr. Jamison was named as administrator in order to create federal diversity jurisdiction. We observe also, as in the Corabi case, that the events complained of in these three suits occurred in Pennsylvania and the decedents were residents of Pennsylvania. If the situation presented requires a cure that cure in the present state of the law cannot come from this court. For the reasons stated in the Corabi opinion the judgments will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer