Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. And Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, 13603_1 (1961)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 13603_1 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 25, 1961
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 295 F.2d 40 READING COMPANY, Appellant v. POPE & TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation. No. 13603. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 17, 1961. Decided Oct. 25, 1961. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge. Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant. Elmer C. Maddy
More

295 F.2d 40

READING COMPANY, Appellant
v.
POPE & TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation.

No. 13603.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 17, 1961.
Decided Oct. 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G. U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope & Talbot, Inc.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon review of the record we find no error.

2

The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F. Supp. 663, will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer