Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Arnold E. Vandersee, the State of California, Intervenor, 13649_1 (1961)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 13649_1 Visitors: 39
Filed: Dec. 26, 1961
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 296 F.2d 734 UNITED STATES of America v. Arnold E. VANDERSEE, Appellant, The State of California, Intervenor. No. 13649. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Submitted Dec. 18, 1961. Decided Dec. 26, 1961. Appeal from the United States District Court for District of New Jersey; Thomas F. Meaney, Judge. Arnold E. Vandersee, pro se. David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., John J. Francis, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for appellee. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PE
More

296 F.2d 734

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Arnold E. VANDERSEE, Appellant, The State of California, Intervenor.

No. 13649.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 18, 1961.
Decided Dec. 26, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for District of New Jersey; Thomas F. Meaney, Judge.

Arnold E. Vandersee, pro se.

David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., John J. Francis, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We agree with Judge Meaney in the district court that the latter does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine appellant's 'motion for Restraining Order' filed February 15, 1961.

2

The order of the district court of April 10, 1961, dismissing said motion will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer