Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

13747 (1962)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 13747 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 16, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 303 F.2d 444 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 408, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. 13747. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued May 14, 1962. Decided May 16, 1962. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Melvin Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Ass. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst.
More

303 F.2d 444

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner
v.
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 408, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF
AMERICA, Respondent.

No. 13747.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 14, 1962.
Decided May 16, 1962.

On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board

Melvin Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Ass. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jules H. Gordon, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.

Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C. (Andrew Zazzali, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The order of the National Labor Relations Board that we are asked to enforce in this case is, in technical contemplation, sufficiently supported by the evidence, though the apparently minimal public or even private significance of the violation evokes wonder that so much has been made of so little. Since we have no authority to impose a rule de minimis upon the Board, the order will be enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer