Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, 14274_1 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14274_1 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 09, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 316 F.2d 736 Sewell W. ROUZER, Appellant, v. Harry E. RUSSELL, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania. No. 14274. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Submitted April 25, 1963. Decided May 9, 1963. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge. Sewell W. Rouzer, pro se. Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (Walter E. Alessandroni, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the
More

316 F.2d 736

Sewell W. ROUZER, Appellant,
v.
Harry E. RUSSELL, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.

No. 14274.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 1963.

Decided May 9, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.

Sewell W. Rouzer, pro se.

Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (Walter E. Alessandroni, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dismissing appellant's original petition with supplements for a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer