Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hazel M. Meerdink v. Irma Ott v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 14364 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14364 Visitors: 34
Filed: Oct. 18, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 323 F.2d 366 Hazel M. MEERDINK v. Irma OTT v. The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 14364. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued September 26, 1963. Decided October 18, 1963. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Joseph P. Willson, Judge. See also 3 Cir., 307 F.2d 721 . John A. Spaeder, Erie, Pa. (Marsh, Spaeder, Baur, Spaeder & Schaaf, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellant. John M. Feeney, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thomas L.
More

323 F.2d 366

Hazel M. MEERDINK
v.
Irma OTT
v.
The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 14364.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued September 26, 1963.

Decided October 18, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Joseph P. Willson, Judge.

See also 3 Cir., 307 F.2d 721.

John A. Spaeder, Erie, Pa. (Marsh, Spaeder, Baur, Spaeder & Schaaf, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

John M. Feeney, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thomas L. Cooper, McArdle, Harrington & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We have examined the record and have weighed the arguments of counsel for the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the proceedings in the court below and we find the appeal lacking in merit. The judgment will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer