Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Harry F. Werling and Frances C. Werling, 14541 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14541 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 31, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 328 F.2d 992 UNITED STATES of America, v. Harry F. WERLING and Frances C. Werling, Appellants. No. 14541. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 6, 1964. Decided March 31, 1964. Hubert I. Teitelbaum, Pittsburgh, Pa., (Morris, Safier & Teitelbaum, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the briefs), for appellants. Burton Berkley, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph M. Howard, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Gustave Diamond,
More

328 F.2d 992

UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Harry F. WERLING and Frances C. Werling, Appellants.

No. 14541.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 6, 1964.
Decided March 31, 1964.

Hubert I. Teitelbaum, Pittsburgh, Pa., (Morris, Safier & Teitelbaum, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the briefs), for appellants.

Burton Berkley, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph M. Howard, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Gustave Diamond, U.S. Atty., on the briefs), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEAHY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was argued thoroughly and most competently on behalf of the appellants. However, we are not sitting as triers of the fact. And, in our appellate function, we must recognize that there was sufficient evidence to necessitate submission of the case to the jury and to adequately support the jury's decision as to both defendants.

2

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer