Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Edward Salter, 14831_1 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 14831_1 Visitors: 114
Filed: Nov. 23, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 338 F.2d 992 UNITED STATES of America v. Edward SALTER, Appellant. No. 14831. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued October 22, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. Bruce M. Schragger, Trenton, N. J., for appellant. Mark E. Litowitz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Stanley C. Van Ness, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel, on the brief), for appellee. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 From our own close stu
More

338 F.2d 992

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Edward SALTER, Appellant.

No. 14831.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued October 22, 1964.

Decided November 23, 1964.

Bruce M. Schragger, Trenton, N. J., for appellant.

Mark E. Litowitz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Stanley C. Van Ness, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel, on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

From our own close study of the record we are convinced that there was no substantial error in connection with the trial of this case.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer