Filed: Jan. 14, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 354 F.2d 658 Patricia GILLOOLY v. ELJAN CORP., a Corporation of New Jersey, Succasunna Realty Corp., a Corporation of New Jersey, Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually. Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually, Appellants. No. 15375. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 13, 1965. Decided Jan. 14, 1966. Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Summary: 354 F.2d 658 Patricia GILLOOLY v. ELJAN CORP., a Corporation of New Jersey, Succasunna Realty Corp., a Corporation of New Jersey, Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually. Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually, Appellants. No. 15375. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 13, 1965. Decided Jan. 14, 1966. Appeal from the United States District Court for the ..
More
354 F.2d 658
Patricia GILLOOLY
v.
ELJAN CORP., a Corporation of New Jersey, Succasunna Realty
Corp., a Corporation of New Jersey, Eli Gaynor and
Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch
and Eli Gaynor and Janice
Gaynor, Individually.
Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and
Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually, Appellants.
No. 15375.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 13, 1965.
Decided Jan. 14, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., Judge.
Allan Maitlin, Newark, N.J. (Feuerstein & Sachs, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellants.
John A. Gleeson, Newark, N.J. (Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, Newark, N.J., George P. Lacay, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
This case was fairly tried and properly submitted to the jury. We have carefully examined all of appellants' points for appeal. There is no error of any substance in the trial record.
2
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
