Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Robert Gatewood v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of County Prisons, 15872_1 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 15872_1 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 368 F.2d 179 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ex rel. Robert GATEWOOD, Appellant, v. Edward J. HENDRICK, Superintendent of County Prisons, et al. No. 15872. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1966. Decided Nov. 2, 1966, Certiorari Denied Feb. 13, 1967, See 87 S. Ct. 899 . Robert Gatewood, pro se. Matthew W. Bullock, Jr., Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., (Beryl E. Hoffman, Asst. City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees. Before MARIS,
More

368 F.2d 179

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ex rel. Robert GATEWOOD, Appellant,
v.
Edward J. HENDRICK, Superintendent of County Prisons, et al.

No. 15872.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 20, 1966.
Decided Nov. 2, 1966, Certiorari Denied Feb. 13, 1967, See
87 S. Ct. 899.

Robert Gatewood, pro se.

Matthew W. Bullock, Jr., Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., (Beryl E. Hoffman, Asst. City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

This is in effect a civil action, quite improperly captioned, by Robert Gatewood, a prisoner in the Philadelphia County Prison, for damages under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, 42 U.S.C.A. 1983, for alleged deprivation under color of state law of rights secured by the federal Constitution and laws. What Gatewood complains of is alleged improper medical treatment by the prison authorities. This, however, if true was not a denial of rights secured by the federal Constitution or laws. Threatt v. State of North Carolina, D.C.N.C.1963, 221 F. Supp. 858. Gatewood's claim is, therefore, not cognizable under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, the Civil Rights Act of 1871, as the district court quite properly held. United States ex rel. Lawrence v. Ragen, 7 Cir. 1963, 323 F.2d 410; Snow v. Gladden, 9 Cir. 1964, 338 F.2d 999.

2

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer