Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Samuel Bottone v. Joseph Feconda, Warden of Washington County Jail, Washington, Washington County, Pennsylvania, 16422_1 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 16422_1 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 23, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 382 F.2d 1022 Samuel BOTTONE v. Joseph FECONDA, Warden of Washington County Jail, Washington, Washington County, Pennsylvania, Appellant. No. 16422. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued September 29, 1967. Decided October 23, 1967. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Herbert P. Sorg, Judge. Arnold W. Hirsch, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Washington, Pa. (Harold V. Fergus, Dist. Atty., Washington County, Washington, Pa., on the brief),
More

382 F.2d 1022

Samuel BOTTONE
v.
Joseph FECONDA, Warden of Washington County Jail, Washington, Washington County, Pennsylvania, Appellant.

No. 16422.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued September 29, 1967.

Decided October 23, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Herbert P. Sorg, Judge.

Arnold W. Hirsch, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Washington, Pa. (Harold V. Fergus, Dist. Atty., Washington County, Washington, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Samuel J. Reich, Cooper, Goodman & Schwartz, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Melvin Schwartz, Pittsburgh, Pa., Sigmund S. Bloom, Washington, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

A collateral attack upon the appellee's conviction in a state court on charges of attempted rape and attempted incest resulted in the granting of habeas corpus with appropriate provision permitting the retention of state custody for a new trial. On this appeal from that judgment we are satisfied, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, that the accused did not have the effective representation of counsel at a critical stage of his trial.

2

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer