Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gerardo Restaino and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio, 17079_1 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 17079_1 Visitors: 41
Filed: Mar. 11, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 403 F.2d 218 UNITED STATES of America v. Gerardo RESTAINO and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio, Appellant. No. 17079. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued March 8, 1968. Decided March 11, 1968. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. 1 We have before us a motion filed by the United States to cancel or revoke Mustacchio's bail. The motion asserts that his bail should be cancelled because allegedly he is not and was not living at the address stated in the bail bond at the time bail was
More

403 F.2d 218

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Gerardo RESTAINO and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio, Appellant.

No. 17079.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1968.
Decided March 11, 1968.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

We have before us a motion filed by the United States to cancel or revoke Mustacchio's bail. The motion asserts that his bail should be cancelled because allegedly he is not and was not living at the address stated in the bail bond at the time bail was given. This presents an issue of fact which cannot be resolved without a hearing. One of the issues to be adjudicated is whether or not Mustacchio's mistake, if it was such, was inadvertent or otherwise.

2

Accordingly, we will refer the motion to the court below to the end that it may determine whether or not Mustacchio's bail should be revoked, cancelled or increased. Concerning these issues we express no opinion.

3

SEITZ, Circuit Judge, would refer the motion for appropriate disposition by the District Court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer