Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

17164_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 17164_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 24, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 403 F.2d 717 160 U.S.P.Q. 453 ALLEN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and Colonial Rubber Works, Inc., an Indiana Corporation v. NATIONAL SPONGE CUSHION CO., Inc., a California corporation, Appellant. No. 17164. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued Oct. 10, 1968. Decided Nov. 27, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 31, 1968, Certiorari Denied March 24, 1969, See 89 S.Ct. 1194. Louis M. Welsh, San Diego, Cal., Pendleton, Neuman, Seibold & Williams, Chicago, Ill. (Sidney Neuman, Chi
More

403 F.2d 717

160 U.S.P.Q. 453

ALLEN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and Colonial
Rubber Works, Inc., an Indiana Corporation
v.
NATIONAL SPONGE CUSHION CO., Inc., a California corporation,
Appellant.

No. 17164.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 10, 1968.
Decided Nov. 27, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 31, 1968,
Certiorari Denied March 24, 1969, See 89 S.Ct.
1194.

Louis M. Welsh, San Diego, Cal., Pendleton, Neuman, Seibold & Williams, Chicago, Ill. (Sidney Neuman, Chicago, Ill., Philip J. Albert, Trenton, N.J., William J. Birmingham, Chicago, Ill., Welsh & Gibson, San Diego, Cal., Levy, Levy, Albert & Marcus, Trenton, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.

Don K. Harness, Detroit, Mich., Backes & Backes, Trenton, N.J. (Richard E. Dibner, Detroit, Mich., Robert M. Backes, Trenton, N.J., Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting plaintiff's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict following a jury trial and verdict for defendant. Appellant contends that there were conflicts of fact necessary for the jury to resolve; and that there was no showing that reasonable men could not have reached the verdict returned by the jury and thus, in granting the motion, the district court usurped the function of the jury to find the facts.

2

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error. We will affirm the order of the district court on its thorough and well-reasoned opinion, Allen Industries, Inc. v. National Sponge Cushion, Inc., 292 F. Supp. 504 (D.N.J.1967).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer