Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James E. Bush v. William B. Robinson (Warden), County Jail, Allegheny (County of Allegheny) — Dismissed 5/22/70, 19316_1 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 19316_1 Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 15, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 442 F.2d 393 James E. BUSH, Appellant, v. William B. ROBINSON (Warden), County Jail, Allegheny (County of Allegheny) — Dismissed 5/22/70. No. 19316. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted on Briefs April 2, 1971. Decided April 15, 1971. James Bush, pro se. Norman J. Cowie, Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, County of Allegheny. Maurice Louik, County Sol., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, Robinson (Craig T. Stockdale, Asst. County Sol., Pittsburgh, Pa., on t
More

442 F.2d 393

James E. BUSH, Appellant,
v.
William B. ROBINSON (Warden), County Jail, Allegheny (County of Allegheny) — Dismissed 5/22/70.

No. 19316.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted on Briefs April 2, 1971.

Decided April 15, 1971.

James Bush, pro se.

Norman J. Cowie, Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, County of Allegheny.

Maurice Louik, County Sol., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, Robinson (Craig T. Stockdale, Asst. County Sol., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief).

Before FORMAN, SEITZ and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant allegedly contracted trench mouth in the County Prison of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, while confined there awaiting trial. He brought a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 which, upon motion, was dismissed by the district court. The action was properly dismissed against the County of Allegheny. A municipality is not a person contemplated by the Civil Rights Act of 1871. United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84, 86 (3 Cir. 1969). The action was also properly dismissed against the Warden because the allegations contained in the complaint rose "no higher than an averment of a tort." United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. County of Philadelphia, supra, 413 F.2d 84, 87. The negligence alleged by appellant is not cognizable under the Civil Rights Act.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer