Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Early W. Hairston, Jr. v. Joseph Hutzler, in No. 72-1060. Appeal of William Kaufman in No. 72-1059, 72-1059 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 72-1059 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 13, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 468 F.2d 621 Early W. HAIRSTON, Jr., et al. v. Joseph HUTZLER et al., Appellants in No. 72-1060. Appeal of William KAUFMAN in No. 72-1059. Nos. 72-1059, 72-1060. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) Oct. 5, 1972. Decided Nov. 13, 1972. Peter J. Mansmann, Mansmann, Beggy, McVerry & Baxter, and Herbert Bennett Conner, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants. John B. Leete, Laurence B. Green, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees. Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and F
More

468 F.2d 621

Early W. HAIRSTON, Jr., et al.
v.
Joseph HUTZLER et al., Appellants in No. 72-1060.
Appeal of William KAUFMAN in No. 72-1059.

Nos. 72-1059, 72-1060.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) Oct. 5, 1972.
Decided Nov. 13, 1972.

Peter J. Mansmann, Mansmann, Beggy, McVerry & Baxter, and Herbert Bennett Conner, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

John B. Leete, Laurence B. Green, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and FORMAN and HUNTER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. After careful consideration of the record and the District Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law in Civil No. 71-826 (W.D.Pa., filed Nov. 18, 1971), 334 F. Supp. 251, the order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer