Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

86-1242 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 86-1242 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 27, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 818 F.2d 28 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wayne J. CALVERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD, THIRD DIVISION; National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Amtrak; Consolidated Rail Corporation, Conrail; Brotherhood of Railway,
More

818 F.2d 28
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wayne J. CALVERT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD, THIRD DIVISION;
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Amtrak;
Consolidated Rail Corporation, Conrail; Brotherhood of
Railway, Airline, and Steamships Clerks, Freight Handlers,
Express and Station Employees, Chesapeake and Ohio System
Board of Adjustment, BRAC Defendants--Appellees.

No. 86-1242.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1987.
Decided April 27, 1987.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Wayne J. Calvert, appellant pro se.

Herbert Better, Office of the United States Attorney; Joanna L. Moorhead, Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation; James W. Constable, Constable, Alexander, Daneker & Skeen; William J. Donlon, Brotherhood Railway and Airline Clerks, Joseph Guerrieri, Jr., Guerrieri & Sweeney, Irving Schwartzman, Savage & Schwartzman, for appellees.)

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing this Railway Labor Act action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Calvert v. National Railroad Adjustment Board, C/A No. 83-4197-JH (D.Md., Sept. 15, 1986).

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer