Filed: Jan. 27, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 808 F.2d 1365 Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff, v. EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee. No. 86-1741. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987. Decided Jan. 27, 1987. Stephen Kimble, Tucson, Ariz., for third party plaintiff-appellant. John Dames, Chicago, Ill., for third party defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Richard M. Bilby,
Summary: 808 F.2d 1365 Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff, v. EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee. No. 86-1741. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987. Decided Jan. 27, 1987. Stephen Kimble, Tucson, Ariz., for third party plaintiff-appellant. John Dames, Chicago, Ill., for third party defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Richard M. Bilby, C..
More
808 F.2d 1365
Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff,
v.
EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee.
No. 86-1741.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987.
Decided Jan. 27, 1987.
Stephen Kimble, Tucson, Ariz., for third party plaintiff-appellant.
John Dames, Chicago, Ill., for third party defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge, Presiding.
Before NELSON, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
The district court did not abuse its discretion in its partial denial of the motion for summary judgment filed by Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, Eureka Fluid Works, and in its grant of the motion for a directed verdict filed by Third Party Defendant/Appellee, Borden Chemical Company.
