Filed: Nov. 05, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 944 F.2d 1088w 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2298 , 60 USLW 2201 FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner No. 90-3690, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL CENTER, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, Respondents American Federation of Government Employees, Intervenor. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL C
Summary: 944 F.2d 1088w 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2298 , 60 USLW 2201 FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner No. 90-3690, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL CENTER, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, Respondents American Federation of Government Employees, Intervenor. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL CE..
More
944 F.2d 1088w
138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2298, 60 USLW 2201
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner No. 90-3690,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL
CENTER, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material
Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea
Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy
Publishing and Printing Service, Respondents
American Federation of Government Employees, Intervenor.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL
CENTER, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material
Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea
Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy
Publishing and Printing Service, Petitioner No. 90-3724,
v.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.
Nos. 90-3690, 90-3724.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued May 9, 1991.
Decided Sept. 13, 1991.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Granted,
Opinion and Judgment Ordered Vactaed
Nov. 5, 1991.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
