Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 Cases), 94-1540 (1995)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 94-1540
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 27, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 894 Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 cases) NOS. 94-1540, 94-1541 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 27, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01245 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared fr
Summary: 61 F.3d 894 Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 cases) NOS. 94-1540, 94-1541 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 27, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01245 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared fro..
More
61 F.3d 894
Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson
v.
United Parcel Service (2 cases)
NOS. 94-1540, 94-1541
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 27, 1995
Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01245
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Source: CourtListener
