United States v. James Long, 94-3336 (1995)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 94-3336
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 13, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 897 U.S. v. James Long NO. 94-3336 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 13, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 93-00220 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per cur
Summary: 61 F.3d 897 U.S. v. James Long NO. 94-3336 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 13, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 93-00220 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curi..
More
61 F.3d 897
U.S.
v.
James Long
NO. 94-3336
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 13, 1995
Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 93-00220
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Source: CourtListener
