Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ACLU v. Black Horse Pike, 94-5233 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 94-5233 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 25, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-25-1995 ACLU v Black Horse Pike Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-5233 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "ACLU v Black Horse Pike" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 196. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/196 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States
More
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-25-1995 ACLU v Black Horse Pike Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-5233 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "ACLU v Black Horse Pike" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 196. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/196 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ NO. 94-5233 _______________ THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, ON BEHALF OF ITS MEMBERS; AND EDWARD ROSS v. BLACK HORSE PIKE REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION; HIGHLAND REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL; FRANK PALATUCCI, PRINCIPAL IN HIS OFFICE AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, Appellants _______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges. O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court list the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court, \s\ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge Dated: July 25, 1995
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer