Filed: Jun. 09, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 896 Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz NO. 94-5655 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 09, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-00615 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of
Summary: 61 F.3d 896 Sharon Sandusky v. Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz NO. 94-5655 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 09, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-00615 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of c..
More
61 F.3d 896
Sharon Sandusky
v.
Sodexho Sandusky, Paul Kelly, Tom Hincher, Anne Ortiz
NO. 94-5655
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 09, 1995
Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-00615
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
