Filed: Jun. 29, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 895 Selim Kesedar, Verda Kesedar v. Sun Company, Inc. NO. 94-5737 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 29, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-108, Bissell, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminate
Summary: 61 F.3d 895 Selim Kesedar, Verda Kesedar v. Sun Company, Inc. NO. 94-5737 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 29, 1995 Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-108, Bissell, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated..
More
61 F.3d 895
Selim Kesedar, Verda Kesedar
v.
Sun Company, Inc.
NO. 94-5737
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 29, 1995
Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 93-108,
Bissell, J.
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
