Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick, 98-5136 (1999)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 98-5136
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 06, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-6-1999 Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-5136 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/1 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the
Summary: Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-6-1999 Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-5136 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/1 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the ..
More
Opinions of the United 1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-6-1999 Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 98-5136 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999 Recommended Citation "Conte Bros Auto Inc v. Quaker State Slick" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/1 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 98-5136 In Re: Conte Bros Auto Inc vs. Quaker State Slick The following modifications have been made to the Court's opinion issued on December 30, 1998 in the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: (1) On page 4, 12th line from the top of the page: please insert the word "the" after "is." The complete sentence should read: The harm the Appellants allege they suffered is the loss of sales of products they sell, such as regular motor oil, that compete with Slick 50. (2) On page 5, 21st line of text: please insert a hard return after the comma following the words, "commercial activities". 22nd through 24th lines of text: please unindent these lines of text so that they are indented the same amount as subparagraph (1). (3) On page 20, 34th line of text: please delete 1998 and replace it with "4th ed. 1996." (See page 18 for example of proper citation to McCarthy). (4) On page 21, 18th line of text: please make the same changes as indicated above in (3). (5) On page 25, 31st line of text: please insert "(4th ed. 1996)" after 27-12. (See page 18 for example of proper citation to McCarthy). /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk January 6, 1999
Source: CourtListener