Filed: Aug. 04, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-4-2003 Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3890P Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 294. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/294 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opi
Summary: Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-4-2003 Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3890P Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 294. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/294 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opin..
More
Opinions of the United
2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
8-4-2003
Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 01-3890P
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003
Recommended Citation
"Dean Witter Reynolds v. Druz" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 294.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/294
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________________
NO. 01-3890
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.
v.
DAN A. DRUZ,
Appellant
_________________________
On Appeal From the United States District Court
For the District of New Jersey
(D.C. No. 00-cv-2564)
District Judge: Honorable Anne E. Thompson
Argued: November 5, 2002
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge,* McKEE and HILL,**
Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is granted. See Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds,
Inc.,
537 U.S. 79 (2002), which overturned precedent, i.e., PaineWebber v. Hartmann,
921 F.2d 507 (3rd Cir. 1990), upon which the panel opinion filed 2/27/03 was partially
predicated. The panel opinion is hereby vacated and a revised opinion is filed
contemporaneously herewith.
*
Judge Becker’s term as Chief Judge ended on May 4, 2003.
**
The Honorable James C. Hill, United States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals, sitting by designation.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Judge Edward R. Becker
Circuit Judge
DATED: August 4, 2003
RLS/cc: Honorable Anne E. Thompson
Mr. Dan A. Druz
Edward S. Nathan, Esq.