Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Columbia v. Surface Transp Bd, 02-2599P (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 02-2599P Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 26, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-26-2003 Columbia v. Surface Transp Bd Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-2599P Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Columbia v. Surface Transp Bd" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 293. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/293 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the
More
Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-26-2003 Columbia v. Surface Transp Bd Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-2599P Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Columbia v. Surface Transp Bd" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 293. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/293 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 02-2599 ____________ BOROUGH OF COLUMBIA; SHAWNEE RUN GREENW AY, INC. Petitioners, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents, FRANK SAHD SALVAGE, Intervenor Respondent. Appeal from the Surface Transportation Board 1411 Corp. — Abandonment Exemption — in Lancaster County, PA STB Docket Nos. AB-529X & AB-581X ____________ Argued: April 10, 2003 Before: BARRY and ROSENN, Circuit Judges, POLLAK, District Judge* (Opinion Filed August 26, 2003) ____________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION ____________ The slip opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows: * Honorable Louis H. Pollak, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 1. On page 26, in the third full paragraph, line 8, change “includes” to “included.” 2. On page 27, in the first full paragraph, insert a comma after “April 12, 2001.” 3. On page 27, note 1, line 1, change “states” to “stated.” 4. On page 28, line 6, change “is” to “was.” 5. On page 30, in the first full paragraph, delete the ellipsis at the beginning of the quotation. 6. On page 30, in the second full paragraph, line 2, change “was” to “is.” 7. On page 31, in the first full paragraph, line 2, insert a comma after “2001" and change “owns” to “owned.” 8. On page 31, in the second full paragraph, line 4, change “desires” to “desired.” 9. On page 31, in the last full paragraph, remove the quotation marks in lines 2 and 3. 10. On page 31, in the last paragraph, line 3, insert “or” before “a need for” and on line 4 insert “or proof” before “that there is sufficient.” Delete also the comma at the end of line 4. 11. On page 32, in the second full paragraph, lines 4 and 5, delete “is to” and substitute “should.” 12. On page 33, the first full paragraph, delete the quotation marks at the end of the block quotation. BY THE COURT: /s/ Max Rosenn Circuit Judge Dated: September 3, 2003
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer