Filed: Feb. 04, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-4-2004 USA v. Austin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 02-3308 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Austin" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 1028. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/1028 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United State
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-4-2004 USA v. Austin Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 02-3308 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Austin" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 1028. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/1028 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States..
More
Opinions of the United
2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
2-4-2004
USA v. Austin
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 02-3308
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004
Recommended Citation
"USA v. Austin" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 1028.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/1028
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3308
___________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs.
JAMES AUSTIN
Appellant.
___________
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(D.C. Criminal No. 01-cr-00130-1)
District Judge: The Honorable Petrese B. Tucker
___________
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
January 26, 2004
BEFORE: NYGAARD, FUENTES, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.
(Filed: February 4, 2004)
___________
OPINION OF THE COURT
___________
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant James Austin pleaded guilty to seven counts related to trafficking
in crack cocaine. The District Court sentenced the Appellant to ninety-seven months
imprisonment. Austin filed a notice of appeal, pro se, and his appointed counsel, Jeremy
C. Gelb, Esq., filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Counsel indicated that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
We have carefully reviewed the Appellant’s brief, along with the responsive
brief of the United States and other matters of record. Austin did not file a pro se brief.
We conclude, after our own review of the entire record, that the District Court did not err.
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
The motion of defense counsel to withdraw will be granted.
_________________________
TO THE CLERK:
Please file the foregoing opinion.
/s/ Richard L. Nygaard
_________________________________
Circuit Judge
1