Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mash Entr Inc v. Prolease Atl Corp, 04-1821 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-1821 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 09, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-9-2006 Mash Entr Inc v. Prolease Atl Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-1821 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Mash Entr Inc v. Prolease Atl Corp" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1613. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1613 This decision is brought to you for free and open
More
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-9-2006 Mash Entr Inc v. Prolease Atl Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-1821 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Mash Entr Inc v. Prolease Atl Corp" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1613. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1613 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos: 04-1821/3422 MASH ENTERPRISES, INC, f/k/a HUMAN RESOURCE OPTIONS, INC.; PROFESSIONAL LEASING CONCEPTS, INC. v. PROLEASE ATLANTIC CORPORATION; PROFESSIONAL STAFF LEASING CORPORATION; BALAJI RAMAMOORTHY, a/k/a Bala Ram; REBECCA RAMAMOORTHY, a/k/a Becky Ram; ASPI IRANI; ALBERT HAWK; CHARLES EHRIG v. HOWARD VOGEL; MARK FRIED, Counter Defendants Mash Enterprises, Inc., f/k/a Human Resources Options, Inc., Howard Vogel, and Mark Fried, Appellants Present: Sloviter, McKee & Rosenn * , Circuit Judges ORDER AND NOW, upon consideration of the Petition for Panel Rehearing filed in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that page lines 3-5 on page 15 of the Opinion dated December 29, 2005, are hereby amended to read as follows: “After the set-offs, the most ProLease Atlantic could owe to MASH is about $325,884 plus interest at the rate * The language for this Order was drafted by Judge Rosenn, the author of the Opinion, before he died. However, the Order was not filed until after Judge Rosenn’s death. specified by the contract. This represents only about 17% of what MASH claimed was still due under the contract.” By the Court, /s/ Theodore A. McKee DATED: February 9, 2006
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer