Filed: Jun. 15, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-15-2006 Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-2018 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 892. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/892 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-15-2006 Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-2018 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 892. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/892 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of ..
More
Opinions of the United
2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
6-15-2006
Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 05-2018
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006
Recommended Citation
"Mufulu v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 892.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/892
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 05-2018
____________
GILONDA KINGAMBO MUFULU,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES;
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondents
____________
On Petition for Review from an
Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board No. A73 569 669)
Immigration Judge Donald V. Ferlise
____________
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
June 15, 2006
Before: FISHER, CHAGARES and REAVLEY,* Circuit Judges.
(Filed June 15, 2006)
____________
OPINION OF THE COURT
____________
*
The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth
Circuit, sitting by designation.
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
The mistake in this case is clear: the Board of Immigration Appeals reviewed the
wrong order. An order of removal was initially entered against the alien in April 2002,
based on his failure to appear at a scheduled hearing. (A. 22-26; A.R. 107-09.) However,
the order was subsequently rescinded when the immigration judge determined that the
alien had not been given notice of the proceeding. (A. 28-30, 43, 45.) A second hearing
was held in September 2002, at which the alien appeared, and a new order of removal was
entered based on the immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination. (A. 46-51.)
The alien then appealed from that order. (A.R. 102.) Unfortunately, the Board assumed
that the order under review was the rescinded one, issued in April 2002. (A. 89; A.R. 2.)
It affirmed based on the alien’s failure to appear, without addressing the adverse
credibility determination on which the final order of removal, entered in September 2002,
was based. (A. 89; A.R. 2, 102.) The alien now petitions for review.
We cannot affirm a decision of the Board on grounds other than those on which it
relied. See, e.g., Li v. Attorney General,
400 F.3d 157, 163 (3d Cir. 2005). Since the
Board failed to address the merits of the final order of removal, we are precluded from
doing so. We will grant the petition for review and remand this case to the Board so that
it may consider the order issued in September 2002.
2